Financial analysis report on Restaurant Brands Essay

Individual Assignment Individual AssignmentFiscal analysis study on Restaurant Trade names

Word Count: 996 words

Submitted By:

Table of Contents Table of ContentssList of figuresList of TablesExecutive SummaryThe IndustryThe CompanyThe FinancialsDecision and RecommendationMentions

List of Figures

Restaurant Brand’s shops in New ZealandGross graph for the last 5 old ages for Restaurant Trade namesBank Debt and dividend of the companyStock Price for Restaurant Trade namesNet income Margin and company’s purchase

List of Tables

S.W.O.T. analysis of the industryS.W.O.

T. analysis of the Restaurant Trade namesGross of Restaurant Brands from its franchisesNet incomes and Dividends from 2008 boulder clay 2014

Executive Summary

Restaurant Brands is a New Zealand company which franchises major trade names like KFC, Pizza Hut, Starbucks and Carl ‘s Jr. across New Zealand. This study shows a fiscal analysis about the company so as to do a determination whether Portfolio Managers Ltd. can put in the company.

Restaurant Brands founded in 1997 is a good established company and has 176 shops in New Zealand. Fast nutrient has become a new tendency and one the most demanding industry in the current decennary and Restaurant Brands is a leader in this industry. Financially, the company has drastically increased in gross comparing the old old ages. And it has proved there is a changeless income in the concern. The company ‘s new venture in Carl ‘s Jr. has besides showed a nice profitableness in the industry which shows the company is spread outing nationally in different fast nutrient trade names.

The whole study would take to urge Portfolio Managers Ltd. to put in Restaurant Brands.

The Industry

Food is one of the industries in the universe which is profitable if the trade name maintains its quality and it is good established.

Few old ages back New Zealand did non hold much fast nutrient eating houses, fast nutrient has become a necessity in today’s coevals. And franchising a good established fast nutrient trade name is acquiring better. As the rise in figure of different transnational trade names in the last few old ages show the rise in the industry.

As an industry there can be tonss of competition but there are merely few major fast nutrient trade names. Restaurant Brands operates with major participants like KFC, Pizza Hut, Starbucks and Carl’s Jr. There is a little possibility of competition in the market as the rival trade names like McDonnell ‘s, Dominos pizza are emerging.

S.W.

O.T

Positive Negative
Internal Strengths– Existing concern theoretical account – Support from the trade name- Lesser competition for bigger trade names- Less labour costs Failings– Constrained industry- High care- Lesser profitableness
External Opportunities– Changeless income- New and large market Menaces– Intervention of authorities ordinance- Trade name repute is precedence

Table 1: S.W.

O.T. analysis of the industryThe rise of the Part-Time Economy, Refranchising, eCommerce integrating, Multiple Unit Ownership and More statute law of franchising are the few major tendencies in this industry.

The industry is somewhat new to the market but a profitable industry. A right trade name would take to high success rate and profitableness.

The Company

A universe broad recognized trade name has its ain criterions and method of operation, pull offing a trade name worldwide is impossible. Franchising companies like Restaurant Brands plays a major function in pull offing these branded ironss of retails. As of February 2014, the company has 176 mercantile establishments which includes 90 KFC, 51 Pizza Hut, 27 Starbucks and8 Carl ‘s Jr mercantile establishments. There are over 3,700 employees and 60,000 clients visit per twenty-four hours all over New Zealand. The increasing figure of shops for every trade name over the old ages and the quality maintained by every shop is the major success of this company.

The undermentioned chart shows the figure of shops the company owns ; the company has major per centum of KFC shops.Figure 2: Gross graph for the last 5 old ages for Restaurant Trade names

2014 ( $ m ) 2013 ( $ m ) Change ( % )
Entire Group Revenue 330.4 312.

8

+5.6
Net Net income After Tax 20.0 16.2 +23.5
KFC Gross saless 241.5 237.

0

+1.9
Pizza Hut Gross saless 48.4 47.9 +1.

1

Starbucks Coffee Gross saless 25.0 25.1 -0.3
Carl’s Jr Gross saless 14.3 1.

9

+662.2

Table 3: Gross of Restaurant Brands from its franchisesThe above tabular array shows the split up of the gross of each trade name. Increased per centum of gross revenues generated by KFC and Pizza hut of 1.

9 % and 1.1 % severally. And there is a lessening in gross generated by Starbucks.

The interesting fact is that the freshly opened shops of Carl’s Jr. are bring forthing Gross saless which is 662 % addition in the gross compared to old old ages. The operating hard currency flow for the company is $ 32.7 m and the company’s bank debt has dropped to $ 8.1 million.

Develop A KM Strategy For Kentucky Fried Chicken Commerce Essay
  • Business Policy and Strategy Essay
  • Organizational Culture by Charles Handy Essay
  • Coca-Cola Essay
  • Customer Satisfaction Essay
  • An introduction to national economic accounting Essay
  • The Performance of Internet Service Provider Markets of Australia Sample Essay
  • air newzealand
  • Evaluation of Walgreens Company Sample Essay
  • Copyright © 2021 The New Standard Gallery. All rights reserved.
    x

    Hi!
    I'm Tamara!

    Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

    Check it out