Harper Lee’s ”To Kill a Mockingbird” and Thomas Hardy’s ”The Sons Veto” Sample Essay

Prejudice has caused the hurting and agony of others for many centuries. Some illustrations of this include the Holocaust and bondage in the United States. In To Kill a Mockingbird. by Harper Lee racism was the cause of much torment to the inkinesss of a segregated South. Along with inkinesss. other groups of people are judged below the belt merely because of their difference from others. The bias and dogmatism of society causes the subjugation of people with differences. What was besides evident is the bias that people had to confront when seeking to support the rights of those minorities who were being oppressed.

Some who are discriminated against are those who are born otherwise than the bulk. One individual that is treated below the belt is Calpurnia. as you can see when Aunt Alexandra tried to acquire Atticus to fire Calpurnia. because in her eyes. Calpurnia wasn’t a good adequate female function theoretical account ( p. 136 ) . This is a prejudice action. because Calpurnia is every bit good as a function theoretical account as Aunt Alexandra. if non better. Calpurnia despite all the remarks and bias against her carries on with life. whilst Aunt Alexandra has all the furnishings of a white adult female who thinks her place in life is preordained and everybody should cognize their topographic point. If they do non so they are unnatural and should be capable to choler. which I would see as subjugation and bias. Possibly Aunt Alexander was afraid that her position of inkinesss was incorrect and that they were human existences after all and that was a awful idea in the South.

Another individual who is treated like an inferior is Scout. She is treated severely by her instructor. because she knew how to read. “She discovered that I was literate and looked at me with more than swoon antipathy. ( p. 17 ) . ” Scout is treated like it is her mistake that she knows more than the mean kid did. She learned earlier than others so she gets punished unjustly. This is another illustration of people pigeonholing people and the danger of the stereotype. Children can non make certain things and if they can they are unnatural and will go capable to bias. One can see it in schools all over the universe. The “Brainy” pupil who is capable to roast by his/hers equals. The ” thick” pupil once more ridiculed and cajoled by his/hers equals and his/hers instructors. Peoples who do non follow the norm are capable by certain elements to prejudice in one signifier or another

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Tom Robinson is besides one who is discriminated by a biased community. Tom is found guilty by the jury. in his instance against the Ewells ( p. 211 ) . The guilty finding of fact is a direct consequence of a racialist community. Tom was ne’er given a just opportunity in the test. even though that the grounds was turn outing him guiltless. Peoples that are born otherwise frequently acquire mistreated and are discriminated against.

Another group that is treated ill in the society based on bias are the people who have chosen to be different. One who chose to be different is Dolphus Raymond. He pretended to be drunk so no 1 gave him any problem on the manner that he lived his life ( p. 200 ) . The manner a individual lives should be at that place ain personal concern. He has the right to populate otherwise than others if he feels that is the manner he wants to populate But the problem is he knows that by get marrieding a black adult females. his society will reprobate him. so he sees a manner to avoid it in going a sensed rummy. In this manner he deflects one signifier of bias for another easier to populate with signifier of bias.

Another individual that lives otherwise is Boo Radley. Boo stayed inside his house for a figure of old ages without of all time coming out to interact with others. He didn’t want attending that would come from the rumors that were said about him. Narratives were made up about him and he felt it was best for him to remain indoors. The people who chose to be different took a hazard of being made castawaies of the bulk of the society and one manner of avoiding the bias of the universe was to conceal off from it. But in so making he is non populating a life he lives a self-imposed prison being. So even in seeking to avoid what is traveling on outside his house he is being punished.

The concluding group that was made to experience different was the group that defended and protected the minorities and the wrongfully treated people. Atticus was a good illustration of one who defended the different by supporting Tom Robinson in his instance. Atticus had unity that gave him the strength to digest the ridicule that arose from his determination to support a black adult male in a unintegrated country. Atticus was threatened and his kids were treated ill by their equals. because he had the bravery to stand up for the laden. Sheriff Tate defends the different when he says. “I ne’er heard Tell that it’s against the jurisprudence for a citizen T make his uttermost to forestall a offense from being committed. which is precisely what he did. but possibly you’ll say it’s my responsibility to state the town all about it and non hush it up. ( p. 276 ) . ” Sheriff Tate is seeking to protect Boo from the attending that could scare him. The sheriff is making the right thing by concealing the truth from the community. By supporting the different. people take a opportunity of being known as strange or inferiors to the remainder of the people that they are about and in so making become marks for bias which they themselves are seeking to support.

In Thomas Hardy’s The Son’s Veto. Prejudice is once more highlighted. but in a different manner. There are elements of societal standing. household background. instruction. faith and sexism. The whole subject of the narrative is one woman’s. Sophy. travel through life and the effects she has to populate with because of the force per unit areas of life in that period and the outlooks made upon her by society.

She is a caring adult female. who altruistically makes determinations based on other people’s feelings instead than her ain felicity. She starts life as a amah in the vicar’s family. a retainer but non much more She has no life other than that. There is a brief interlude where she walks with Sam. another villager of her societal standing who would wish to travel out and get married her. She appears non to be to lament on this thought nevertheless after the vicars married woman dies and Mr Twycott. the vicar decides to lose one member of his staff she selflessly voluntaries stating that she will get married and populate with Sam. Even though she admits when asked. ” Well – do you desire to get married? ” ” Not Much. But it would be a place for me. And we have heard that one of us will hold to go forth. ” Mr Twycott who hadn’t consciously noticed her before. now looks on her tenderly because of what she is prepared to make. but non as peers but as an fond maestro to a wounded animate being ( What a kitty like. flexuous. stamp animal she was! on a But after an statement with Sam she approaches Mr Twycott and asks him non to acquire rid of her. Because of her limping and the manner she has acted Mr Twycott states that he can’t allow her travel and asks her to get married him.

This where the biass of the universe Sophy lives in conspire against her and destroy what could be a happy life.

The first is the fear she holds him in. particularly as he is a vicar. she does non love him but he is of a category where regard is automatic and to decline a petition was non even considered.

This comes from her upbringing where the working category teach themselves that the upper-class. aristocracy and the ministry are people above them in their lives and who are to be obeyed.

Equally Mr Twycott in the same manner of thought. realises that when he marries a on the job category girl his societal standing within that community is ruined and he will necessitate to travel off to another portion of the state where his married woman and her background will non be known.

Even their boy conspires to remind her of her lowly background with mention to her usage of words “Have” alternatively of “Has” .

Even when MR Twycott dies and Sophy meets her old friend Sam. and she finds some felicity and some possible hereafter. her ain ideas are non for herself but for her boy who is at public school and who wants to travel onto University and the Ministry. She decides for his personal standing. her matrimony to a on the job category adult male and her life in a grocers store will non assist him. She decides to set her felicity on clasp until he has achieved his purposes. When he has. his bias and selfishness. in non desiring to hold a on the job category female parent and stepfather. keeps her away from felicity.

Randolph’s instruction and upbringing edict that he is the adult male of the house and she will make what he say’s. This sexism of the period is besides shown when Mr Twycott arranged all the family fundss with legal guardians. instead than with his married woman.

Even faith plays a portion in advancing these biass when Sophy has to curse n the bible non to get married Sam. This usage of faith to underscore bias has been used for ages to acquire people to believe. that which sometimes needs challenging.

The evilness of the bias in this narrative is highlighted by the concluding paragraph when Sophy dies and is traveling to be buried and Sam “whose eyes were wet” as the mourning manager base on ballss was looked upon by the priest. who I imagine is the boy with eyes “As black as Cloud” . Even in decease there was no felicity.

Throughout both these narratives bias. subjugation and the forcing of someone’s will on others is the large factor. All these biass are a negative factor in the influence on people’s life. It has caused people to be hurt. maimed and killed. It has kept people in a universe where they are oppressed and forced to populate out lives that they have to instead than desire to populate in. In both narratives the force per unit areas that invoke this bias are all around the people. Religion. instruction. societal category. upbringing. race. age. sex and history have conspired to give single their stereotypes and with them the manner to handle people.

These stereotypes and the biass they carry are really hard to take from people. When bondage was abolished in the USA. the South still regarded the Blackman as a slave. so until late the Klu Klux Klan still treated the Blackman as a slave and because they did non play their portion they were killed. tortured and frightened. I have used them as an illustration but every bit all across the universe the same thing is go oning. In The Son’s Veto I see all the societal biass ruin a good individuals life. There is no intimation of any battle to do things right and the desperation of decease is the lone thing to look frontward to. However in To Kill a Mocking Bird. there were people who tried to make the right thing and in their ain manner showed that there are good people in life who are prepared to seek and do a difference.

Lessons can be learnt from both of these narratives. The Son’s Veto showed me that we shouldn’t unrecorded our lives by the biass imposed on us. However. To Kill a Mockingbird showed me that the people with differences are non ever making things the incorrect manner. It is the bulk that may be making at it all incorrect.


I'm Tamara!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out