1. IntroductionLeadership went through a long development procedure. From the unconditioned leading to acquired traits. Leadership has ever been a procedure which competes for others’ aid and support and achieves a common end ( Martin M. Chemers 1997 ) .
Leadership decided to enterprise size. strength. success or failure. To a certain extent. it is the most of import factors taking to the success or failure of the endeavor. the more power of the leading.
the higher degree of the endeavor ( JunHao Chen 2011 ) . The chief intent of this study is to measure leading method of Kirsty conforms to the modern leading theory and farther research on the advantages and failing of his leading. This study focused on the current most popular subject in concern word. Harmonizing to the instance survey. all her sandwich mill senior direction squad is made up of adult females. Sandwich Company and its leader Kirsty made the alteration of Leader-member exchange ( LMX ) .
Path-goal theory and ‘New’ leading.Kirsty delegated more power to his staff and trusted staff to be to the full committed and is unfastened to thoughts. The staff were happy and basking their devolved duty. The leading theory has been integrated into Kirsty’s leading manner. Modern leading attack in Sandwich Company was developed. and helped endeavors to further open the market. This research of the study is average that the theoretical account of modern leading attack has become a inclination which widely used in development of modern endeavor.
After thorough research and analysis. development of leading in Sandwich Company has been a success. Kirsty said that alteration ne’er stops. Therefore. the modern leading will be an of import portion of endeavor accommodation.
2. Literature Reappraisal2. 1 Path-goal Theory attackIn many different types of modern leading attack.
the Path-goal Theory attack is the primary 1. The theory argues that leader depending on the different state of affairs and nature demands different types of leading behavior. take the best way in order to accomplish the end. This leading work is necessary to supply to do certain that their ends can be adjusted with organization’s ends ( Robert J House 1996 ) .
The path-goal theory has been considered to be the best leading behavior. is the most suited for the demand of the endeavor staff and work environment. steer them finish the active undertaking under the best way ( Northouse 2013 ) .
In add-on. harmonizing to theory of ( Robert J. House 1996 ) . leader set up the mark way and improves the way to guarantee the ends including the undermentioned facets. Leadership Process.Leaderships confirmed the demands of the employees. supply appropriate ends.
will accomplish the end with wage. take obstructions of public presentation. and give employees certain counsel. Aims Puting.
Group members need to experience that their end is valuable. and can be and accomplish the end under the leading of the bing resources. If there is no common end. different members will travel in different waies. The way improved. Leaderships besides need to cognize some eventuality factors and choice of taking solutions particularly have to equilibrate the demand for two types of support. before finding the smooth realisation of the mark way. Leadership Styles.
Leader behaviours incentive consequence. which made the demands of the subsidiaries associated with effectual occupation public presentation. and supply the necessary counsel.
support and wages.The independent variable of Path – Goal theory is leader’s behaviors. Therefore the path-goal theory considered that leaders are flexible and they can alter their behaviors or manner depending on the state of affairs ( Evans. Martin G. 1970 ) .
2. 2 Leader-Member Exchange Theory attack ( LMX )Leaderships build the particular relationship with a few subsidiaries. These persons become insiders which are trusted and acquire more attention from the leader.
are besides more likely to go the privileged director ( Deluga. RJ 1998 ) . LMX pay close attending to the nature and quality of the relationship between leaders and their subsidiaries ( Robert Leo Power 2013 ) .
LMX theory predicts that the subsidiaries in interior circle will acquire higher assessment degree. The endeavor will acquire lower turnover rate and higher satisfaction rate. The formation of leader – member exchange relationship is a procedure accompanied by the development of the clip and alteration of development ( Bauer & A ; Green 1996 ) . This alteration is from the “binary” relationship of Lead – member to the squad degree. developing the squad – members exchange relationship.For leaders. mandate itself means taking hazards.
hence. leader must swear his subsidiaries. and will take action. For subsidiaries who have the higher public presentation degree and strong ability in the early Phase. are easy to derive more trust and mandate more than others ( Sherony. K.
. & A ; Green. S. 2002 ) . The leader will develop a loyal relationship with his Senior Management Team ( SMT ) so that the SMT can make more end product by the influence of leader ( Rozhan Othman. etc.
2009 ) . However. Subordinate’s public presentation is non satisfactory. due to the subordinate’s trueness to his leading. his work and mistakes will be tolerated.
Therefore. foremost. the leaders should be understood the consequence of the behavior which promote constructing the higher quality of leader-member relationships. Second.
LMX is a long-run procedure which is based on bettering the capableness of leader’s information feedback. occupation undertaking analysis and the ability to depute. Get downing from the subsidiary merely coming into the organisation. subsidiary can be able to come in the occupation functions every bit shortly as possible. Through the counsel and encouragement particularly incentives. new members take on more undertakings. increase willingness to finish the undertaking every bit much as possible and will be subordinated to inner circle. The kineticss of LMX development should be focused ; invariably review organisation scenario and LMX relationship which has been established and do accommodations harmonizing to the changed environment.
( HongDu. etc. 2002 )2. 3 ‘New’ Leadership Theory attackNew leading theory includes magnetic leading and transformational leading. New leading demand to concentrate on the hazard and alterations in the concern environment.
Transformational leading theory relates leader with subsidiary. and efforts to make a procedure which can better the degree of both motive and moral character between leaders and subsidiaries ( James M. Burns 2010 ) . It involves emotion.
values. moral criterions. and long-run ends. including follower’s rating of the motivations and meets their demands ( Northouse 2007 ) .
The idealized influence which the leader needs to put the value of the undermentioned and set him as a theoretical account to the followings is the of import portion of the transformational leading. The feature of the appeal is transfusing the sense of pride to the followings and do leader Gain regard and trust. ( Edward Szewczak & A ; Coral Snodgrass 2002 ) . New leading theory can break explicate the leader’s ability to get by with the extremist alterations and the transmutation of direction failure.The transformational leading of the New Leadership Theory attack chiefly embodied in the undermentioned facets.
idealised influence. inspirational motive. rational stimulation. individualised consideration. Leaderships.
who normally have these factors. have strong values and ideals. can successfully promote employees beyond the involvements of the person for team’s end though common cooperation and common battle ( James M. Burns 2010 ) . The leader can take subsidiaries to transcend the outlooks though behavioral features of transformational leading ( John H. Humphreys & A ; Walter O. Einstein 2003 ) .
However. this method besides has its restriction. It should be kept the balance and focused on the demands in the work of the subsidiaries alternatively of merely concentrate on the wagess and penalties ( Kevin B. Lowe. etc 1996 ) .
3. Analysis of the instance survey3. 1 Path-goal Theory attackThe Path-goal Theory is as the attack of reflecting the leading manner of leading to be used by Sandwich Factory. In the instance survey. harmonizing to the words of kiesty. she attempt to do her subsidiaries know that they had the common end to fight and recognize.
Kirsty got her subsidiaries together as a squad to finish what way and end the leader let the subsidiaries know. The consequence of the leader is taking the followings to accomplish the mark. The path-goal theory has been considered to be the best leading behavior. is the most suited for the demand of the endeavor staff and work environment.
steer them finish the active undertaking under the best way ( Northouse 2013 ) .Kirsty is unhampered to pass on with her subsidiaries because of regard each other. The subsidiaries are believed that the return of the work is worthy if they consider that they have the capableness to transport out the work and will be success ( Northouse 2013 ) . However. she is likely to be considered to cognize all by employees.
really the quality and capacity do non needfully reach high degree. This sort of influence which following the leader. can take to some employees irrespective of the state of affairs with serious effects.3.
2 The Advantages and failings of Path-goal theory attack in the instance survey.On one manus. this sort of attack can be influence on the work attitude and the company construction accommodation. On the other manus. the attack ensures the member to finish the undertaking swimmingly. cut down unneeded processs and mistakes. Harmonizing to the ( N. K.
Jain 2005 ) . “leader behavior has on low-level motive. satisfaction and performance” .Supportive Leadership and Achievement Orientated Leadership. If employees are non satisfied with the bing work or leading.
the leader will work out this job. and go on to pay attending to it which the leader demand and like the friendly environment ( Colin P. Silverthorne 2005 ) . Kirsty show sufficient assurance to the employees that her outstanding employees can work in their several Fieldss.
The illustration in the instance. the subsidiaries enjoy degeneration of authorization and duty which the Kirsty gave.For the failing. Path-goal theory attack is overbroad and attempts to affect every facets of the leading. It is hard to unite theory with pattern and use the theory to the work.3. 3 Leader-Member Exchange Theory attack ( LMX )The LMX is the best manner to cover with the interior circle and the exterior. Harmonizing to the Kirsty.
she considered that the subsidiary to the full committed to what they need and increase ain input to the concern. because the attack has the steady and powerful relationship. The leader will develop a loyal relationship with his Senior Management Team ( SMT ) so that the SMT can make more end product by the influence of leader ( Rozhan Othman. etc. 2009 ) . “The subsidiaries enjoy degeneration of authorization and duty which the Kirsty gave” .
This sort of rights –trust exchange will lend to the growing of the endeavor direction squad and the development of endeavors.In add-on. the subsidiary is frequently considered to be good at all of the undertakings.
merely because their occupation is really good every bit same as a subordinate’s public presentation is non good. because of trueness. he is tolerated by his leader.
The defect of this sort of phenomenon is affects the quality of the work.3. 4 The Advantages and failings of LMX theory attack in the instance survey.In the instance.
Kirsty open a new Sandwich Factory with her friends and portion the concern. Kirsty’s friends are considered the advantage in the endeavors. Kirsty are runing the good relationship with her friends. and her friends help her manage in the SMT based on common regard and trust between them. LMX attack can elaborate the nucleus leading procedure. The high quality of LMX is that Leaders rely on their followings and requires them to take more duty and engagement in more work ( Hana Medler-Liraz & A ; Ronit Kark 2011 ) .However. direction squad.
in certain fortunes. may be out of control. deprived of many of the leaders.
take over the company and destruct the organisational construction and maps of the endeavor ( Rozhan Othman etc. 2009 ) . In the instance. this sort of circumstance will non look in a short period of clip because of the Kirsty’s new company. Kirsty’s Leadership Style will non let it to go on.
3. 5 ‘New’ Leadership Theory attackIt involves emotion. values. moral criterions. and long-run ends. including follower’s rating of the motivations and meets their demands ( Northouse 2007 ) . Kirsty said that she would seek her best to assist the staff work out jobs.Leadership Style of the Kirsty is seen as the transformational leading to assist the member in the organisation achieve success.
The leader can take subsidiaries to transcend the outlooks though behavioral features of transformational leading ( John H. Humphreys & A ; Walter O. Einstein 2003 ) . Transformational leading can put a sort of values and an illustration to be influence on subsidiaries. In the instance. the staffs enjoy the more rights and duties which the Kirsty gave.
Kirsty’s staffs have a better working status and spirit into the work. Transactional relationship is another 1 of the new modern relationship. This attack is base on the public presentation of subsidiaries in the work. penalty or wages. But this attack is non suited for Kirsty’s manner which tends to loosen up and harmonious working environment.
3. 6 The Advantages and failings of ‘New’ Leadership Theory attack in the instance survey.The feature of transformational leading is that leaders can allow the subsidiaries feel the verve of endeavors. and excite their enthusiasm. Kirsty can utilize this method to put up a sandwich factory’s end. with the end of squad. Harmonizing to the Young Entrepreneur ( London ) Monthly in the instance.
He has the ability to put up ain sandwiches mill. besides need more like-minded people to develop the endeavors.Leaderships. who normally have these factors. have strong values and ideals. can successfully promote employees beyond the involvements of the person for team’s end though common cooperation and common battle ( James M. Burns 2010 ) .
The leader can take subsidiaries to transcend the outlooks though behavioral features of transformational leading ( John H. Humphreys & A ; Walter O. Einstein 2003 ) .The key to success of the new theory attack rely on the high-quality staff. In other words.
subordinate do non cognize whether the leader’s determination is right. and deficiency of the necessary analysis. Harmonizing to the Kirsty’s word. she has to hide and cover with some issues fast when she found them in the early phase.
This is chiefly because of transactional leading behaviors. If the subsidiary work public presentation is lower than expected. he will be excluded by the leader. This is the biggest drawback of the Transactional theory.4.
Decision.This study has analysed the three chief modern theories separately including the attacks. advantages and failing. and how they affected the leader and followings. The path-goal theory can promote the staff to finish to work. The LMX theory is shown a sort of relation which is an exchange and communicating between the leader and subsidiaries. Transformational theory can break explicate the leader’s ability to get by with the extremist alterations and the transmutation of direction failure.
The Sandwich Factory has a long-run Strategic Planning and a strong powerful leader to back up progressive development. For illustration. they create a new market and demand to cover with concern every bit shortly as possible. The modern leading theory attacks are used flexibleness by Kirsty in the Sandwich Factory. Advantages and disadvantages of the modern theory are attendant. Therefore. the key is heightening advantage and avoiding disadvantage.MentionMartin M.
Chemers. 1997. An integrative theory of leading. “leadership is a procedure of societal influence in which one individual is able to enlist the assistance and support of others in the achievement of a common undertaking. ” New Jersey. United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Page: 200. hypertext transfer protocol: //books.
Google. co. uk/books/about/An_Integrative_Theory_of_Leadership. hypertext markup language? id=rKG_iwuQg_MC & A ; redir_esc=yJunHao Chen. 2011. LEADERSHIP.
Beijing: Enterprise Management Publishing.Joseph Clarence Rost. 2003. Leadership for the Twenty-first Century. “Leadership is the activity of act uponing people to endeavor volitionally for group objectives” . Nutmeg state: Greenwood Publishing Group. Page: 76.
Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //books. Google. co. uk/books? id=-bM7E8ORH7QC & A ; pg=PA76 & A ; lpg=PA76 & A ; dq=Leadership+is+the+activity+of+influencing+people+to+strive+willingly+for+group+objectives & A ; source=bl & A ; ots=DKwFkCMhGJ & A ; sig=_hzFfoMahEU02yGE6Rbe3N2FUnE & A ; hl=zh-CN & A ; sa=X & A ; ei=iOhIVJnaC-6P7AbnkoCYCg & A ; ved=0CD0Q6AEwAg # v=onepage & A ; q=Leadership % 20is % 20the % 20activity % 20of % 20influencing % 20people % 20to % 20strive % 20willingly % 20for % 20group % 20objectives & A ; f=falseHouse. Robert J 1996. “Path-goal theory of leading: Lessons. bequest.
and a reformulated theory” . Leadership Quarterly. Vol 7. issue 3.
page: 323–352.Northouse. P. ( 2013 ) . Leadership Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Inc.Ridley.
M. 2003. Nature via raising: Genes. experience.
and what makes us human. New York. NY. United states: HarperCollins Publishers. Page: 326.Evans. Martin G. 1970.
“The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship” . Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 5. Page: 277–298.
Deluga. RJ. 1998. Leader-member exchange quality and effectiveness evaluations: The function of subordinate-supervisor conscientiousness similarity” . Group and Organization Management. Vol23. issue2.
Page: 189-206.Robert Leo Power 2013. Leader-Member Exchange Theory in Higher and Distance Education. THE INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING ( IRRODL ) . Athabasca University. Vol14.
No 4 ( 2013 ) . Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. irrodl. org/index.
php/irrodl/article/view/1582/2631Bauer,T.N & A ; Green,S.G.1996. Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal trial.
Academy of Management Journal. vol. 39. Page:1538-1567.Sherony. K.
. & A ; Green. S.
2002. Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers. leader-member exchange.
and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol 87. issue 3. Page: 542-548.Rozhan Othman & A ; Foo Fang Ee & A ; Ng Lay Shi. 2009.
Understanding dysfunctional leader-member exchange: ancestors and results. Leadership & A ; Organization Development Journal. Vol. 31 No. 4. 2010 Page: 337-350. Available at: World Wide Web.
emeraldinsight. com/0143-7739. htmHongDu & A ; ZhongMing Wang. 2002. Leader – member exchange theory research and application chances.
Journal of Zhejiang University. Issue 6. 2002. Humanistic disciplines and societal scientific disciplines edition.James M.
Burns. 2010. LeadershipHarper Perennial Political Classics.
“New leading theories include magnetic leading and the later. and extremely influential. theory of transformational leadership” .
New York City: HarperCollins. 2010. Page: 544. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //books.
Google. co. uk/books/about/Leadership. hypertext markup language? id=knMrdtmEIYEC & A ; redir_esc=yEdward Szewczak & A ; Coral Snodgrass.
2002. Pull offing the Human Side of Information Technology: Challenges and Solutions. “This magnetic dimension of transformational leading is characterised by supplying a vision and a sense of mission. transfusing pride among the group. and deriving regard and trust” .
Pennsylvania: Idea Group Inc ( IGI ) . 2002. Page: 11. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //books. Google. co. uk/books? id=IAWyJlgEwCMC & A ; pg=PA11 & A ; lpg=PA11 & A ; dq=This+charismatic+dimension+of+transformational+leadership+is+characterised+by+providing+a+vision+and+a+sense+of+mission.
+instilling+pride+among+the+group. +and+gaining+respect+and+trust & A ; source=bl & A ; ots=CUEBa6rEKS & A ; sig=494p3QDd9Ljg4VOpKfCgyazrsC0 & A ; hl=zh-CN & A ; sa=X & A ; ei=US5MVMDJNLCV7AavuIGoCQ & A ; ved=0CCoQ6AEwAQ # v=onepage & A ; q=This % 20charismatic % 20dimension % 20of % 20transformational % 20leadership % 20is % 20characterised % 20by % 20providing % 20a % 20vision % 20and % 20a % 20sense % 20of % 20mission % 2C % 20instilling % 20pride % 20among % 20the % 20group % 2C % 20and % 20gaining % 20respect % 20and % 20trust & A ; f=falseJohn H. Humphreys & A ; Walter O. Einstein. 2003. “Nothing new under the Sun: transformational leading from a historical perspective” . ManagementDecision.
Vol:41 Issue: 1. Page. 85 – 95.
Kevin B. Lowe & A ; K. Galen Kroeck & A ; Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam. 1996. Effectiveness correlatives of transformational and transactional leading: A meta-analytic reappraisal of the mlq literature. The Leadership Quarterly. Vol 7. Issue 3.
1996. Pages 385–425. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. sciencedirect.
com/science/article/pii/S1048984396900272N. K. Jain 2005. Organisational Behaviour Vol. 1. “In kernel. the way end theory efforts to explicate the impact that leader behavior has on low-level motive. satisfaction and performance” .
New York: Atlantic Publishers & A ; Dist. 2005. page: 328. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //books. Google. co. uk/books? id=XuPsE7J-6GcC & A ; pg=PA328 & A ; lpg=PA328 & A ; dq=In+essence.
+the+path+goal+theory+attempts+to+explain+the+impact+that+leader+behaviour+has+on+subordinate+motivation. +satisfaction+and+performance & A ; source=bl & A ; ots=AA2tFnp-4W & amp ; sig=2hHyNgMDXZDgXNTnk248Yet-G1g & amp ; hl=zh-CN & A ; sa=X & A ; ei=5NNMVP7OPMLB7Aa94YBA & A ; ved=0CCkQ6AEwAQ # v=onepage & A ; q=In % 20essence % 2C % 20the % 20path % 20goal % 20theory % 20attempts % 20to % 20explain % 20the % 20impact % 20that % 20leader % 20behaviour % 20has % 20on % 20subordinate % 20motivation % 2C % 20satisfaction % 20and % 20performance & A ; f=falseColin P. Silverthorne 2005. Organizational Psychology in Cross Cultural Perspective. “The supportive leader likes a friendly environment and gives strong attending to the demands and well-being of his or her subordinates” . New York: NYU Press. 2005. Page66.
Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //books. Google. co. uk/books? id=5DAQkVwgKBQC & A ; pg=PA66 & A ; lpg=PA66 & A ; dq=The+supportive+leader+likes+a+friendly+environment+and+gives+strong+attention+to+the+needs+and+wellbeing+of+his+or+her+subordinates & A ; source=bl & A ; ots=4iQJhwvv25 & A ; sig=-9Ca94VRw-FuduJNekyCYhRxFZI & amp ; hl=zh-CN & A ; sa=X & A ; ei=Z9pMVLXWA7Lg7QaU9oCABg & A ; ved=0CCIQ6AEwAA # v=onepage & A ; q=The % 20supportive % 20leader % 20likes % 20a % 20friendly % 20environment % 20and % 20gives % 20strong % 20attention % 20to % 20the % 20needs % 20and % 20wellbeing % 20of % 20his % 20or % 20her % 20subordinates & A ; f=falseHana Medler-Liraz & A ; Ronit Kark 2011. It takes three to tango: Leadership and ill will in the service brush.
The Leadership Quarterly. Vol 23. Issue 1. 2012. Page: 81–93.
“Leaders in high quality LMX relationships rely