Papers Gallery

Morality is the difference between good and evil. It is the determination of what should be done and what should not be done; or what is right and what is wrong. Morality affects both behavior and motivation. All people live according to a set of moral concepts, especially for religious people. This is evident in The Crucible by Arthur Miller. It is the Puritan city of Salem, Massachusetts, and the witch hunt. Many people are falsely accused of witchcraft. Individual moral integrity and its absence are exemplified by Arthur Miller in The Crucible. The fear of witchcraft surrounds Puritan society and thus creates a rule of the people. The destiny of the city depends on the morale of its inhabitants. John Proctor and the Reverend Hale are key figures in the condemnation of witch trials; Abigail, Judge Danforth and his supporters are in power. Although the trials with Salem’s release must end with alleged witchcraft, the individual’s responsibility was to ensure that the majority was not completely destroyed by mass hysteria.
In this story, key people must make decisions that challenge their beliefs and ethics. You must choose to do the right thing and fight the lie or do something wrong and yield to the lie to save your life. Elizabeth Proctor is one of those people who fought for the truth, then she; In my opinion, he is the most moral person in history. Elizabeth is the wife of John Proctor; Reserved, honest, slow to complain and respectful. She and her husband share a strict respect for justice and moral principles. She has to maintain a strong confidence in her own morality and in one’s ability, sense of justice, even if this principle clashes with strict Christian doctrine. She is known throughout the city for being a very Christian woman, who knows all her commandments. Every time her husband is confused or hesitant, she leads him on the path of righteousness. For example, she urges him to end the witch trials by exposing the truth about Abigail’s sinful and deceptive ways. If your husband has to decide whether to murder or confess a witch, he does not want you to surrender to a corrupt and unjust society. Although she does not want to lose her husband, she does not lose her morality and her beliefs. Even if Proctor decides to die, instead of signing a confession that would have been a lie, he does not try to fight his decision, but shows respect for his good decision when he says, “Now it’s okay.” God forbid, I take it off! “This shows that not only yours but also her husband’s morality was important.
Of all the characters in the Crucible, Elizabeth proved to be the most moral. In a society where the rule is to be prosecuted or charged, she decided to respect her morality, even if that meant her disappearance. She made a decision that was good in her eyes. “Often there are real moral tests where people are tempted to cheat, slander or exploit one another, few who really succeed.” This statement proved to be true, especially during the witch hunt, but Elizabeth Proctor appeared as a person who managed to defend their bases and protect their manners. The lack of moral integrity shown by the characters in the work creates a chain of destructive events. Due to Reverend Paris’s concern for socialism and political power, the actions of Abigail and her supporters will go unpunished. This puts the city of Salem in a whirlwind of lies. A domino effect affects the multiplication of charges. Abigail, who runs the property, receives believers. This group has no respect for itself or others. The city dwellers and especially the girls danced and fed in bulk. Because of blind observance and weak morality, many friends and neighbors are cynically disinherited and executed without mercy. In The Crucible, individual moral integrity contributes to the happy separation of Salem processes. John Proctor and Reverend Hale take a stand against authority figures and public morals. By alerting and alerting the public to the company’s failure, Proctor and Hale arrest the mafia government. Without the rebellious attitude of some, it would have deprived innocent victims of fundamental rights such as life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness.