Conclusions, suggestions, or recommendations VI’. Sources (Bibliography, references, book titles, authors, pages and website) -3- l. Objectives: The overview of this topic, it basically provides different information, facts, point of view, theories, hypothesis, experiments and essential knowledge for every learner. Students will be able to read and discuss literary and nonliterary texts in order to understand human experience. Another thing is that they can also be able to read to acquire information from a variety of sources.
Orally communicate information, opinions, and ideas effectively to an audience for a particular purpose. Interpret history using a variety of sources, such as biographies, diaries, journals, artifacts, eyewitness interviews, and other primary source materials. Before, during and after a calamity will be also discuss in this particular topic. Furthermore, we can easily define the basic types as well as the effects of every natural disaster or calamities by knowing the whole topic. Multiple numbers of questions will be tackled here as we go along through the whole topic.
For example, “How will natural disasters affect human life and activities? “, “What are the agencies responsible for predicting and examining natural disasters? ” so on and so forth. The assessment of this lesson will be based upon learner involvement in the class concussions, the quality of research, depth of understanding evidenced in the construction of the statements, and the conclusions reached concerning the need for and the variety of human responses to natural disasters. Now, let’s move to the introductory part of this topic. 4- II. Central Introduction: People have always tried to understand the natural world in which they live. In early times, they created myths to explain their experiences with fire, flood and other violent forces. Over the centuries, new scientific discoveries added to their knowledge. Yet, nature continues to affect human lives and people still seek to cord their feelings about these uncontrollable forces. Examine accounts by Americans from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries of their life changing experiences with nature.
Witness their experiments with the new technologies of motion pictures and panoramic photography to record the immensity of events with which they struggled. Read their moving personal accounts. Study the poignant lyrics of songs they wrote to memorial each event. Use your research skills to search the American Memory collections to broaden your understanding of how people have dealt with disaster. Then share your learning by creating a presentation for others in which you assume the role to a witness to such an event and create your own personal account.
The number of natural disasters in the world has shot up over the past two decades. Scientists argue over the extent to which climate change is responsible for this phenomenon but no one can seriously deny such disasters are increasing in scale and frequency, nor that in tandem with a rapid rise in population and the growing concentration of -5- people in cities, the number of people affected by disasters can also be expected to rise.
A gloomy thought, but one best tackled head on if the consequences are not to be gloomier still, which is why we should welcome the initiative launched today by the International Development minister, Garret Thomas, on changing the way we respond to natural disasters. Mr. Thomas notes that we, primarily meaning wealthy Western nations, need to greatly increase the funds we make available to the Nun’s Central Emergency Response Fund, the Cert., and at the same time chewy our prosperous neighbors, some of whom are paying almost nothing, into making a more proportionate contribution.
We can take pride in the fact that so far Britain has been the largest single contributor to the fund, although we should bear in mind that countries with populations a fraction of the size of ours, such as Holland, Norway and Sweden, are not very far behind. France, meanwhile, has given far less than its tiny neighbor Luxembourg, while America has given only slightly more than Belgium, though this lackluster sum is due rise under the Obama administration.
The backdrop to Mr. Thomas call is a recent Sofas report which warns that the world needs to prepare itself for an almost two-fold rise in the number of people likely to be every affected at any one time by natural disasters, from about 250 million today to roughly 375 million in about five years’ time. Succumbing to compassion fatigue – as well to growing doubts in some people’s minds about the whole argument on climate change – many will dismiss this as another apocalyptic scare story that won’t come true.
This would be a mistake. As Sofa’s report rightly noted, the term natural disaster is going to have to be broadened in future to encompass not only the kind of quakes, flood and droughts with which we are familiar but also inevitable conflicts between growing -6- populations over declining resources. The recent carnage in central Nigeria – ostensibly between Christians and Muslims but also a battle for access to land of declining quality – is a disturbing portent of a thousand conflicts to come over land and water.
Our recent experience of disaster response and disaster management in Haiti, meanwhile, should serve to remind everyone that rapid action and preventive action nude in the long retaken by global bodies like the Emergency Response Fund costs tar less term than UNC-ordinate and poorly targeted aid, or aid that trickles in late. Mr.. Thomas is right to point out that while money is crucial, improved co-ordination f global responses to disasters is equally important, which is why a UN summit to agree on a framework for collective action on the future of humanitarian support would be a good idea.
It all sounds a tall order, and hard to sell to the public at a time of relative economic hardship. But it is worth pointing out that overhauling and radically increasing the capacity of bodies like Cert. to meet the scale of tomorrow’s disasters will cost a fraction of the money that we have spent on bailing out banks, and will undoubtedly save millions of lives. Ill. Body or Content of the Topic: