AbstractThe book review is done to portray the picture of oppressive nature that women go through. It is a basic claim by feminism that women are generally oppressed. However in some cases men are also oppressed but it is only that men don’t show this publicly. Masculine issues are considered in this context. For women, such allegations are specifically frightening as sensitivity is a virtue that is assigned to them. The author in the book particularly talks on the perceptive issues occurring on the women’s side especially the situations they undergo. It depicts perceptive that exists on a number of issues such the gender, race, and class. She says that if at all they are insensitive, then they lack some traits and she views this as not being true women.
Most women are silenced before they can contribute towards anything hence have no voices in any matter. The book shows that the women’s situation is drained off meaning and guilt means tripped. The experience under this situation of oppression is that of censure, exposure to chastisement, and deprivation.
The requirement for the oppressed persons is to maintain themselves contented and cheerful most of the time. This signals their tameness and compliance in that kind of situation. The author of the book gives a true picture of the situation women go through to act as eye opener. This is with view of people noticing the elements that are systematically connected in oppression (Rothenberg, 2002).IntroductionIn a society at large, situations such as sunniest countenance expose persons hence are seen as mean, bitter and dangerous. This implies that people find it hard to work in such situation and the outcome of this is rape, arrest, beating and murder.
It is people who opt for danger in their perfect form and pace of obliteration. This is ordinary in the United States where younger women are mostly in a bind. The sexual action and inaction is not considered to be correct.
If such a lady is heterosexually active, then she is liable to criticize and chastisement for giving in easily to men and amoral. The chastisement that such women receive is in the form of criticism, snide and humiliating comments. The treatment as an easy lay is done by men. In another way, such women get scorn from their restrained feminine acquaintances.
In some cases, such women have to lie and hide their behaviour from parents (Rothenberg, 2002).Women in this situation try hard not to be impregnated and avoid risk contraceptives. If such ladies try to refrain from heterosexual type of conduct, they are in continuous harassment by men. Such men make efforts to convince them into the habit.
They normally press these young women to relax and give in to their demands. The women are threatened with various labels such as being chilly, tense and man-hater. Although parents are at the front line of restraining their daughters from such behaviours, they sometimes become worried about their inactivity. This suggests to them that their daughters might not become famous or are sexually abnormal. Such ladies are condemned due to their lesbianism activities.In an environment where a lady is raped and was earlier on thought to be heterosexually active, then she liked it. But in a situation where she was not heterosexually active earlier on, she is also presumed to have liked it.
This is because she could have been re-pressed and frustrated. Therefore both heterosexual activity and inactivity have the likelihood of being taken as a proof that such ladies craved for rape. Majority of these women don’t win but rather are entangled in a truss.
That is between systematically connected pressures. Women also are found in this manner by systems of pressures and obstacles that cause them to face penalty, loss or contempt. This is regardless of whether they work in outside the home or not.
Whether on welfare or not, bear kids or not, raise kids or not, stay married or not. Also whether they are heterosexual, lesbian or both. Women are considered to be confined to ethnic or sexual task ghettos, sexual pestering and nepotism. There are also forces of competing anticipations and judgments about women, wives and mothers.
This occurs in the society, racial and ethnic subcultures and in individual’s mind (Johnson, 2006).Women are taken to be effortless as they rely on completely or partially on their husbands, parents or the state. Dedication to political opinions, loyalties to racial or ethnic and demands for self respect and responsibility are taken to be minor in them. Each of the factors exists in intricate tension and penalizes the present options. If a person dresses in one way, that person is normally assumed to be marketing sexual accessibility. If that person dresses in another way, she is thought to be careless and unfeminine. If a person uses a strong language, she is grouped as a whore and if such person doesn’t, she is grouped as a lady.
This implies that one is delicately constituted to endure the strong speech. Women are made to pass through various treatments that oppress them.The trend is now still going on although at a reduced magnitude as majority of women are now empowered and know their rights.
Experience got from the oppressive environment proves that leading a person’s life form is controlled and formed by pressures and obstacles. Such forces aren’t fortuitous or infrequent and therefore can be avoided. Such forces and barriers are methodically connected to each other. Therefore can find a person flanked by and amid them and limits movement in any direction. It is infact the experience of a person caged in all avenues and direction being blocked (Roschelle, 1997).Oppression is difficult to view and know it.
Therefore one has to study the components of a cruel composition with immense together with goodwill. It is clear that this will be done without viewing the system in totality. Therefore oppression is like a cage where there are people caged in there. Also their movement and mobility are limited and their lives are formed and abridged in there. The arrest of vision at a tiny level generates such usual confusion about the male door opening rituals. This kind of ritual is remarkably extensive across categories and contests.
This has and continues to puzzle many people where some of them find it offensive while others don’t see it as being offensive.The author gives an example of a scene where there are two persons approaching a door. In the process, the male steps a little bit ahead and opens the door. The man then holds the door open as the woman enters the house and the man finally enters and closes the door. In such kind of scenario, people especially fellow men will start calling such man with diverse names. The author is trying to give a picture that any slight help to a woman cannot be termed as oppression to the man.
According to the author the man removed a barrier to the woman’s smooth and unruffled advancement (Works, 1999).The repetition of such ritual definitely will have a place in several patterns. It is after one’s effort to lift the magnitude of perception that will see the whole depiction of the matter.In this context, the door-opening pretends to be an aiding service although the helpfulness is wrong.
This can be viewed by realizing that it can be performed regardless of its realistic logic.Men who are not firm and who are burdened with packages will definitely open doors for able-bodied women. Such women are free from any physical barrier.
Men in such situation do portray themselves in a clumsily way and manhandle every person with aim of being the first ones at the door. Such act to an extent is not determined by expediency or elegance. These various deeds of unwanted aid happen in counterpoint to a pattern of men who are not helpful at all in majority of the workable ways which ladies can need assistance. Women are experiencing a world in which bold princes who charm usually make fuss about being helpful. They consider themselves to be providing services when assistance and other services are minor or of no use. In such services, there are rarely ingenious and adroit princes ready for help when a service is required in mundane welfare or circumstances of threat (Johnson, 2006).
There are situations where men give no aid in his laundry and other services such as typing a report at an impropriate time. Such men cannot offer solution to disputes among relatives or children. They only end up advising that women should stay indoors after dark and be championed by men. Women are taken as objects of pleasure to men and nothing else they can do.
This is a practice that is being practiced today in various parts of the world. The bold gestures have no practical implication but rather symbolic. The author attributes the door-opening and other same services provided to those people who are not able physically and sick.
Therefore the message put across here is that women are incapable. This is the norm that is taken and adopted by majority of people infact in the whole world (Rothenberg, 2004).Majority of women are left out of crucial matters of personal and national concern. That is they are not permitted to contribute their opinions in a particular subject of great concern. And if allowed, their views are not taken so seriously like those of men. The deeds of women are often disconnected from the concrete facts of what women require. This shows that their real requirements and interests are taken lightly or as irrelevant. Such signals copy the behaviour of servants under their masters.
This in real sense mocks ladies where in majority of cases are taken to be servants and caretakers of the men. The signal of false male assistance shows the woman’s reliance, unimportance and disrespect for women.One cannot notice the implication of such rituals if one’s focus is engrossed by personal happening. These comprise the man’s present conscious purpose and reason.
Also the woman’s conscious perception of the happening at that particular time. People whether deliberately or not don’t realize the oppression that women undergo. This is because people fail to notice the diverse components of the situation that ladies pass through. Such oppression components are systematically connected in larger systems. Therefore the oppressiveness of the circumstances in which women live, our numerous and diverse lives is a microscopic phenomenon.
This requires a microscopic view in order to realize the oppressive nature that women live in (Roschelle, 1997).ReferencesPaula S. Rothenberg. (2002). Class, Race, and Gender in the U. S. New York: Worth Publishers.
Paula S. Rothenberg. (2004). Subordination and domination from Gender, Race, and Class: Dynamics of Racism .New York: Worth Publishers.Allan G. Johnson. (2006).
Disentanglement of Sex Tie: Authority and Dispensation in United States. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. Paula S. Rothenberg. (2001). Ethnic Inequality Sociology: Cultural Studies.
New York: Worth Publishers.Paula S. Rothenberg. (2002). When Contest Breaks Out: Discussion about Contest andBigotry in College. New York: Worth Publishers.
Roschelle A. (1997). No additional Kin: Searching Contest, Category, and Sex in Family.
London: Sage PublicationsWorks W. (1999). Sex, Contest, and Task: A Multicultural Fiscal History of Ladies in the U S. New York: Oxford University Press.