“Rape” is a short

“Rape” is a short, one syllable word, but it can destroy one’s life in an instant. A divide between society and a rape victim is so wide, remaining silent about this crime is better than ostracism. One out of six American women is a victim of either an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime (Rainn). Yet, it is a disgrace to bring up such a stigmatized issue. Sexual assault is one of the worst crimes, but for years victims receive backlash and a ruined reputation. When one asks why women and even men are afraid to stand up to their rapist, it is because the justice system is so unfair to sexual assault cases, they have little to no chance. Teaching young girls how to avoid rape has become an old, ineffective method. Society creates a motto where “if you wear less revealing clothes or say no, they’ll leave you alone,” But has that stopped anyone from committing these acts? Sexual assault is often dismissed as attention-seeking, shameful, and non-existent. The first step to restore the justice system is to remove the unfair bias against rape victims.
The most common phrase people ask rape victims is, “What were you wearing?”. It transcends to victim-blaming, a devaluing act where the victim in any type of abusive maltreatment ends in taking responsibility. In many cases, many assume that the survivors could have prevented their assault if they had worn something less revealing. In 2013, the University of Arkansas showcases an art exhibit named, “What Were You Wearing?” 18 students lent the clothes they wore on the day of their assault. The exhibit includes a red “body con” dress, a Wonder Woman tee, and a girl’s fairy princess costume. Women across the country recreate this exhibit to prove how clothes does not determine their answer for consent regardless of either how revealing or covered they are. No matter what kind of clothing a woman wears, clothes should not be a valid reason to rape.
We wear clothes to express ourselves and to boost confidence. However, it seems that clothing connects with issues of sexual objectification, dehumanization, and assault. There is a saying where women who wear sexy clothes are asking for sex, but society should not degrade a woman so low, that her clothes matter more than her body A woman should not be thought of as an object, but rather as someone’s daughter and a human being. It may be comforting to think that sexual assault is something that only happens to people who make bad choices. Unfortunately, men rape not because her clothes are ‘seductive’, but because, “men assert power bestowed on them by mere virtue of their being men”(psychology). Rape is never the victim’s fault
Campus rape is a major issue due since it happens on what was considered a safe place: school. On the night of January 17th, two strangers discovered Brock Turner, raping an unconscious Emily Doe behind a dumpster. The police immediately arrive, arresting Turner after he failed to flee the scene. Emily Doe was later rushed to the hospital, although she was under the influence of alcohol; trying to piece together what had happened in the last hour, a reality hit her so hard; “I thought maybe I had fallen and was in an admin office on campus… A deputy explained I had been assaulted.” Later on, the staff confiscated her clothes, then the nurses measured every inch of her body, had multiple swabs inserted into her vagina, and a Nikon camera pointed right into between her legs. Emily Doe was probed and prodded while she had no idea who raped her. When the case went into trial, Brock Turner was found guilty on three out of five counts of sexual penetration and intention to commit sexual assault. He received a sentence of only six months. Six months for raping an unconscious, vulnerable girl behind a dumpster. A rape conviction serves at least ten years. Turner, being a Stanford student-athlete, gave him such a prestigious reputation that the judge felt “he will be severely impacted” from prison… Emily Doe, defeated, degraded, helpless, Justice was not served. The infamous People vs. Brock Turner case should have been the turning point for sexual assault cases, it could have been a prime example how anyone has to face their consequence. However it is a major setback for cases similar to Emily Doe’s. Al Prosecutor Alaleh Kianerci urged jurors to look past appearances.”Turner may not look like a rapist, but he is the … face of campus sexual assault.”
It is a difficult journey to turn the lives of victims back on track after their assault; rape is not an easy issue to resolve in a matter of months. The process of healing depends on the person and what obstacles they face. The National Women’s Study revealed the reality of the emotional impact on sexual violence. Survivors are more concerned about taking full responsibility for the rape. In fact, 69% of all victims and 66% of recent victims say they worry about accusations against them in their own rape cases. Imagine it is extremely difficult for survivors to love their body again, to feel confident and have self love. It is something that is permanent, a feeling that feels forever unless you are powerful enough to overcome it. Rape is not some Victims should only worry about their life after the assault, not about what people think.
The age-old myth that a woman who cries rape – covering up a regretted act of consensual sex – remains as popular as ever. This punchline serves to harass young girls and women who do not seem credible because of her sexual reputation. There are unusual cases where the defendant is found guilty on a bogus rape charge, and it is terrifying to send innocent people to prison. fabricated reports, however, only make cases with real victims even more difficult. When against the presumption of innocence, or known as the “innocent until proven guilty” doctrine, in convictions of sexual assault, it assumes the accuser is lying. A jury’s perspective against a victim with a sexual reputation creates an attitude of skepticism that could damage the credibility towards the prosecution’s evidence (myth). The natural instinct to accuse women of crying rape did not root from fact, but built from individual and societal prejudice. By law, if the prosecution can’t provide enough evidence of a defendant’s guilt, then the jury must declare them not guilty. Still, it does not mean we have to prove the accuser honest beyond a doubt.


I'm Sarah!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out