Free Summaries

The Relationship between Critical Thinking and Decision Making Sample Essay

Today’s planetary market place requires leaders that can successfully transform their organisations. In the corporate universe. advanced job work outing. critical analytical idea and sound decision-making key the success and laterality of leaders and organisations. This paper examines the relationship between critical thought and the decision-making procedure. explains the class text edition place. and relates how both processes apply to the author’s workplace.

Critical thought involves the ability to analyse and measure information gathered through observations. concluding. treatments with others. contemplation or experience. This disciplined analysis ushers critical minds to build rational beliefs or substantiated sentiments or to take actions. McCall and Kaplan ( 2001 ) specify critical thought in footings of three cardinal points: the “awareness of a set of interconnected critical inquiries. [ the ] ability to inquire and reply critical inquiries at appropriate times. and [ a ] desire to actively utilize the critical inquiries. ” This definition. though. is non a consensus definition. nor is it widely accepted.

Despite a monolithic organic structure of research on critical thought. no individual definition exists. Normally. definitions from celebrated bookmans appear diametrically opposed. Robert Ennis ( 1995 ) defines critical thought as “reasonable and brooding thought that is focused on make up one’s minding what to believe or make. ” In contrast. John McPeck defines critical thought in Critical Thinking and Education ( 1981 ) as the “skill and leaning to prosecute in an activity with brooding incredulity within the context of a subject and the cognition within a given field. ” These two immensely different definitions however highlight two of import constituents of critical thought. The first constituent involves the abilities and accomplishments relevant to the proper apprehension and ratings of grounds. claims. and statements. Both bookmans characterize the 2nd constituent as a leaning to use critical thought accomplishments. The definitions provided by Ennis and McPeck besides hinge on three cardinal constructs in critical thought analysis. Both use similar words: ground. contemplation. and focal point. The commonalty in Ennis and McPeck’s definitions provides three standards for critical minds: ground. rating and focal point.

Directors in today’s workplace. including at ImageStream. must shoulder a great trade of the duty for determination devising. Since many issues in a quickly altering market autumn outside of constituted regulations or well-known state of affairss. clear and accurate thought about these issues takes on added importance. Directors efficaciously using critical idea procedures better decision-making. enhance invention and create strong. unfastened lines of communicating with equals and subsidiaries.

Most issues necessitating critical idea frequently have more than a individual possible solution or ultimate place. Choosing the best solution or place based on the result of critical thought processes constitutes effectual decision-making. If critical thought identifies and combines information and possible solutions. decision-making processes assist critical minds arrive at a individual solution or thought. Decision-making represents a necessary and logical terminal to the critical thought procedure.

McCall and Kaplan outline six stairss to critical thought and decision-making ( McCall and Kaplan. 2001 ) :

1 ) Define and insulate a job

2 ) Gather information

3 ) Outline possible solutions

4 ) Establish prosodies or steps for a solution

5 ) Outline resources and methods available to accomplish the criterions

6 ) Choose a class of action

The six measure theoretical account follows many similar critical thinking/decision-making procedures used by changing organisations. The U. S. Army has distilled the procedure into a Task. Conditions. Standards theoretical account. A cardinal focal point of officer preparation is accomplishing “tactical and proficient competency for specific undertakings. conditions and criterions. ” The Army develops undertakings ( specifying and insulating a job ) . conditions ( garnering information. outlining resources and methods ) and criterions ( metric or steps ) as portion of a “deliberate. uninterrupted. consecutive and progressive” betterment procedure ( Department of the Army. 2002 ) .

ImageStream recognizes the demand for a clear. concise critical thought and decision-making procedure. and encourages directors to further and take a collaborative critical idea procedure in daily operations. Harmonizing to Johnson & A ; Johnson ( 1994 ) . leaders should follow a prescribed sequence of stages. ImageStream uses this sequence to pull off critical idea procedures. proactively resolve struggles and increase the likeliness of successful determinations. particularly in complex state of affairss. After specifying a undertaking. the company follows these stages:

1. Collect information. Obtaining facts is critical. ImageStream encourages determination shapers to seek information and besides analyze the parts of all parties objectively.

2. Probe. By inquiring affecting inquiries. determination shapers encourage parties to pass on and derive a better apprehension of assorted point of views.

3. Salvage face. A cardinal portion of collaborative critical idea procedures. leaders must avoid emotional responses from themselves and participants in the procedure. Humiliating or abashing others is counterproductive and can take to a less-than-thorough analysis of the undertaking.

4. Discover common land. In order to get at a individual solution. determination shapers must unite assorted point of views. facts and possible classs of action. Discovering and foregrounding common land helps direct the procedure toward a concluding determination.

5. Reinforce. ImageStream encourages directors to reenforce the cardinal points and concentrate treatment on bettering the common places. By back uping common land. leaders drive treatment toward a reciprocally agreeable declaration. Critical thought squads use the informations collected in stage one to measure the viability of the emerging solutions.

6. Negotiate. In this stage. the critical minds vet the solutions and formulate clear. concise solutions for choice by the determination shaper or shapers.

7. Solidify accommodations. Leaderships should reexamine and corroborate countries where the squad reaches understanding. This is the concluding measure in procuring the blessing of all squad members and helps to solidify the concluding collaborative determination.

These methods and schemes are cardinal constituents in ImageStream’s corporate portfolio of originative thought. critical thought and determination devising accomplishments. The company and its leaders combine an apprehension of these of import procedures with a scheme that minimizes struggle and promotes detailed critical idea and efficient. informed determinations. This scheme leverages the corporate critical and originative thought accomplishments of workplace squads to bring forth chance for ImageStream.

Mentions

Ennis. R. ( 1995 ) . Critical thought and capable specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher. 18. 75-81.

Headquarters. Department of the Army. ( 2002 ) . FM 7-0: Training the Force. Washington D. C. : Department of the Army.

Johnson. D. W. and Johnson. F. P. ( 1994 ) . Joining Together Group Theory and Group Skills. Boston: Pearson Allyn & A ; Beacon.

McCall. M. W. . & A ; Kaplan. R. E. ( 2001 ) . Whatever It Takes – The Realities of Managerial Decision Making ( 2nd ed. ) . Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

McPeck. J. ( 1981 ) . Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St. Martins.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top