Violence in Sports – an Ethical Perspective Essay

Violence in athletics has become far excessively commonplace. Aggressive athleticss such as football and hockey involve many aggressive tactics ; nevertheless far excessively frequently do these aggressive tactics become overshadowed by calculated Acts of the Apostless of force with the purpose to do bodily injury to an opposition. Many professional and non-profession jocks. every bit good as managers. have adapted the outlook that winning is the common end that all who participate in athletics strive for and hence experience that prosecuting in violent Acts of the Apostless while viing should be permitted in accomplishing this end.

In athletics winning is what each jock strives for and apparently they will consign in harmful Acts of the Apostless of force to accomplish their end. Former Boston Bruins participant David Forbes was quoted “ I merely don’t see. no affair how incorrect the act is. how anything that happens in an athletic competition be criminal” . ( Gillespie ) . The outlook of being above the jurisprudence that most professional jocks possess does non merely impact the game in which they are playing. Many jocks who execute physical Acts of the Apostless of force while viing are more prone to perpetrating such violent Acts of the Apostless in their mundane lives. most normally domestic force. Harvard Law Review ) .

Spectator force and vandalism are besides chiefly linked to the force fans observe during featuring events. ( Williams ) . Besides. professional and recreational athletics has become an built-in portion of our civilization and society. Sports can be seen or heard. in one signifier or another. at any clip of twenty-four hours or dark. Professional jocks are amongst the most publicised people in the universe. Therefore. the words and actions of these jocks have been normally mistaken as impressions of acceptable behavior.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Therefore. people. particularly kids. who view these Acts of the Apostless of inordinate and unsafe force frequently imitate the aggressive Acts of the Apostless they excessively often observe from professional and recreational jocks. The nucleus of these on traveling jobs is the deficiency of. or far excessively lame disciplinary actions assigned to participants who commit improper Acts of the Apostless of force while viing in athletics. League functionaries must implement rough punishments for Acts of the Apostless of force during a clean event. In more terrible instances force in athletics should be treated as a condemnable affair. where culprits can be tried and convicted in civil tribunal.

This paper will discourse the affects that force in athletics has on our society by discoursing the sub subdivisions of the Social Conflict Theory of sociology. In understanding the sociological affects of force in athletics it is possible to discourse how force in athleticss affects our present twenty-four hours society. which closely follows Socrates’ form in accomplishing an ideal province. In using Socrates’ form in accomplishing an ideal province along with the psychological facets of Plato’s central virtuousnesss it will be possible to come to an understanding on how to extinguish force in athletics.

In decision. the paper will discourse why jocks. witting of their actions or non. perpetrate violent Acts of the Apostless while viing by using Psychologist Immanuel Kant’s Theory of Command Given by Reason. Unpunished Acts of the Apostless of force that occur while viing that goes without penalty finally leads to violence Acts of the Apostless while non viing. There have been legion histories of jocks executing physical assault while non viing. The most prevailing signifier of force carried out by jocks off the playing field is domestic force.

Football manager Joe Paterno of Penn State University was quoted “I’m traveling to travel home… . . nd beat up my wife” after a pre-season loss ( Harvard Law Review [ HLR ] . 1996 p. 1048 ) . Many people have speculated about why jocks are like likely to perpetrate Acts of the Apostless of domestic maltreatment. One of these guesss is that participants such as hatchet mans “train to utilize force and bullying on the field and may hold trouble forestalling these lessons from transporting over into their personal relationships” . ( HLR. 1996 p. 1050 ) .

Another. more logical guess is that “sport has had a sort of sanctuary ambiance to it in footings of the legal system and constabularies have kept their distance” . ( Lapchick. 2000 p. ) . For an jock to be above the jurisprudence merely because he or she is an jock is irrational. However. “the populace has gotten fed up with jocks traversing the violent lines. both on and off the tribunal. and that may lend to patrol come ining the sanctuary” . ( Lapchick. 2000 p. 1 ) . If so the constabulary Begin to acquire involved when Acts of the Apostless of force are performed by jocks on and off the tribunal. force and physical aggression may non be as platitude in the hereafter as they are today.

Irrational as it may be for athletics to hold its ain sanctuary ambiance in footings of the legal system. we as a society must oppugn why we finally allow for this to happen. During the 2003- 2004 National Hockey League season Todd Bertuzzi of the Vancouver Canucks brutally attacked unsuspicious Colorado Avalanche frontward Steve Moore. The onslaught left Moore with a broken cervix which finally ended his NHL calling. Although Bertuzzi was suspended for the balance of the season and his squad was fined $ 250. 000 no felon charges were laid.

One can merely inquire how an motiveless onslaught on an unsuspicious victim which finally ended a calling due to a broken cervix can non be treated as a condemnable discourtesy. The Bertuzzi incident is an ideal illustration which illustrates how our society allows professional jocks to recommend themselves above the jurisprudence. The job of force in athletics can be discussed utilizing the sub subdivisions of the Social Conflict Theory of sociology. The Social Conflict Theory of sociology trades with the political orientation that the jobs that society faces are the consequence of the manner that society. every bit good as the economic sciences of that society are organized.

The sub subdivision of Social Conflict Theory that gives support to the account to why we as a society put professional jocks above the jurisprudence is The Marxist Theory. The Marxist Theory can besides be broken down even further into Instrumental Marxism and Structural Marxism theories. The general premises behind the two Marxist theories nevertheless are rather similar. Marxist sociologists view offense as an result of Capitalism. The upper category. or the Bourgeoises. command all manners of production. It is this system that creates the division between the categories.

The upper categories have all they need ; they are the affluent category every bit good as the most powerful and influential. The lower category. or the Proletariat. on the other manus has virtually nil. These are the people left with no power no influence and virtually nil. The general constructs of the Marxist theory are: that the Torahs are set up to protect the involvements every bit good as maintain their fiscal standing while nil is given to the lower categories or the hapless. In our society we view our professional jocks as the upper category or the Bourgeoises.

Professional jocks are so affluent. powerful and influential. Therefore our current Torahs. harmonizing to the Marxist theories. are set up in a manner to protect the involvement of the upper category ( including professional jocks ) every bit good as non to destroy their societal position. The Marxist Theories provide an account of how professional jocks. such as Todd Bertuzzi. can transport out knowing Acts of the Apostless of force and non be prosecuted while if others who are non portion of the upper category ( the Proletariat ) were to transport out the same act of force would be prosecuted in a civil tribunal.

Therefore. to extinguish force in athletics our society must non let subcultures. hockey for an illustration. to follow a different set of Torahs than the remainder of society. Today our society is divided into many different categories. There is the upper category. the upper-middle category. in-between category and so away. Our present twenty-four hours society closely follows Socrates’ form in accomplishing an ideal province. Socrates’ pattern divides society into three categories. The first of the three are the workers. craftsmen. husbandmans. tradesmans ect. Another category is the aides or warriors. and the 3rd category is the defenders or swayers.

Each adult male in the province belongs in one or another of these categories. However to merely split a society into three categories in an effort to accomplish an ideal province seems slightly implausible. Plato believed that every adult male must possess the central virtuousnesss to populate a good live. These virtuousnesss: wisdom. moderation. justness and bravery are indispensable in populating a good life and therefore are indispensable in accomplishing an ideal province. These virtuousnesss nevertheless can be applied non merely to mundane life. but besides to subcultures. such as hockey or football. Plato believes for a province to be ideal it must possess wisdom.

The construct of wisdom is understanding 1s ego and commanding ego. If professional or recreational jocks were to possess the virtuousness of wisdom they finally possess self control. To state an jock committed an act of force accidentally or because he or she was “caught up in the game” is absurd. To perpetrate an act of force with the purpose to do hurt is premeditated. If all jocks were to possess the virtuousness of wisdom they would hold complete control over one ego. All jocks should besides possess the virtuousness of bravery.

Courage can be defined by Plato as “preserving things which may justly be feared” ( Plato 31 ) . In professional and recreational athletics jocks need to esteem and obey the regulations and ordinances. In other words jocks must fear the possible penalties. whether condemnable or non. for force to finally be terminated from athletics. If jocks begin to experience that they are non above the jurisprudence or that their subculture must follow the same Torahs as the balance of society force in athletics will finally diminish.

In the republic Plato describes moderation. the 3rd virtuousness. as: “… within adult male himself. in his psyche. there is a etter portion and a worse ; and that he is his ain maestro when the portion which is better by nature has the worse under control” ( Plato 32 ) . Clearly the virtuousness of moderation is of import to possess for force to decrease in athletics. To get the hang oneself and hold the worse under control would decidedly diminish the sum of force in athletics. Besides. for jocks to hold moderation would do for a more exciting game. To hold control over one’s ego in a squad game means seting the squad before the person. Making so will take to less violent Acts of the Apostless and a more exciting squad oriented manner of drama.

The concluding and most of import virtuousness is justness. Plato believes that if a community were to follow and obey the three old virtuousnesss of wisdom. bravery and moderation justness will automatically be. This can besides be applied to the subculture of athletics. If all people within the subculture of athletics such as the General Managers. conference functionaries and jocks were to possess the three virtuousnesss of wisdom. bravery and moderation justness would automatically be and therefore force in athletics would be a condemnable affair where culprits can be tried and convicted in civil tribunal.

In society there are two types of bid given by ground ; conjectural and categorical jussive moods. Immanuel Kant describes conjectural jussive moods as “an action that must be done to warrant a agencies or make a set goal” . ( Kant 2 ) . Categorical jussive moods are “actions that are done because of their necessity to morality” . ( Kant 2 ) . Conjectural and categorical jussive moods are besides present in subcultures. Athletes who commit violent Acts of the Apostless while viing follow the conjectural imperative bid.

They are driven by hopes of winning and will make whatever it takes to accomplish this end. This is a cardinal factor in giving an account to why some jocks find concluding in perpetrating a violent act while viing in a clean event. Besides this gives account to why some jocks fell that no affair how incorrect the act is. how anything that happens in an athletic competition be condemnable. Following the conjectural jussive mood is described as executing an action to warrant a agencies or make a set end.

If this action is violent many jocks will reason that it should non be considered condemnable because it was a justified action executed to make a set end ; a end which they are entitled and expected to transport out. However. Kant would reason against this stating that the lone ethical rule is cosmopolitan. and hence categorical. is “to dainty oneself. ever as an terminal. ne’er as a mean” . For illustration in hockey a conjectural jussive mood could be “if you don’t obey the regulations you go to the punishment box” . A categorical jussive mood would be “Obey the regulations. it is your duty” .

If athlete’s were to take on a categorical imperative manner of life athletics force would come to an terminal. non because it is right or incorrect. but because it would be the jocks duty to handle oneself. ever as an terminal. ne’er as a mean. However. it is unlogical to presume that force in athletics will one twenty-four hours be non existent. It is non unlogical to presume that if the subculture of athletics and those who are in bid adapt the categorical imperative ways that violent Acts of the Apostless in athletics will be considered a condemnable affair.

To populate a good life it is indispensable to possess the central virtuousnesss. The central virtuousnesss are indispensable in accomplishing an ideal province. In accomplishing an ideal province Kant would reason that the lone ethical rule is cosmopolitan and hence categorical is to handle oneself. ever as an terminal. ne’er as a agency. By handling oneself ever as an terminal. ne’er as a means true justness in present twenty-four hours society will predominate and everyone who commits a violent act will be prosecuted in civil tribunal irrespective if they belong to a subculture or non.


I'm Tamara!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out