Would a individual feel angry if he or she were in a prison for nil? Anyone would state. “Of class! ” Then why do people believe that animate beings feel happy in menagerie. which are the same as prisons? I remember one time I visited Los Angeles Zoo. and I compared this menagerie to what I saw in my state. I noticed a immense difference between them. In the menagerie in my state. all the animate beings were kept in coops. while in Los Angeles Zoo they had more infinite to roll around. However. this is still a “prison”…”Even under the best of fortunes at the best of menagerie. imprisonment itself is snake pit for animate beings meant to roll free” ( Kaufman. 1997. p. 611K7091 ) . Peoples should see this and do a right determination.
Zoos should be closed to the populace. There are many other ways to learn people about the wildlife. such as Television. wireless. magazines and newspapers. books in schools. and so on. As Kaufman points out. menagerie “are learning the incorrect lesson — that it is acceptable to maintain animate beings in imprisonment. bored. cramped. lonely and far from their natural homes” ( June 11. 1997. p. 611K7091 ) . In menagerie. a great figure of people walk by each carnal every twenty-four hours ; this must annoy all the animate beings. For illustration. Morgan says that “hundreds of people [ on a regular basis ] delay for the endangered elephantine leather-backed polo-neck to put eggs” . and that “their noise and flash cameras frighten polo-necks and interfere with the egg-laying” ( 1995. p. 136 ) .
“Animals are non marketable goods to be torn from their households and places at our will and expose for human amusement. ” says Kaufman ( 1997. p. 611K7091 ) . There are several ways for jobbers to do money on an animate being that has been acquired from a menagerie. points out Goldston ( February 11. 1999. p. K1903 ) : it can travel “to a game farm. to an auction. the meat adult male or as an exhibit. ” Then there are people willing to mount it. which can convey them $ 5. 000 to $ 10. 000. and demand for which is great because “Animals from menagerie are in much better status than animate beings in the natural state. ” harmonizing to the aforementioned article by Goldston. In add-on. many menagerie traders do non make what they are supposed to make – that is to convey the captive-bred animate beings back to their natural home grounds. Most of them even merely kill a parent and take its baby to sell it to zoos or any other aggregators ( “Monkey concern. ” p. 65 ) . Therefore. menagerie should be closed so as non to pull those jobbers.
All the animate beings in menagerie are imprisoned. so zoos should be eliminated to liberate the prisoners. As anyone can detect. they are unable to make what they want to ; they merely walk back and Forth in their enclosures. This leads to the likeliness that after returning from menagerie. they might non be able to “hunt and fend for themselves in the natural state. ” says Sarel new wave der Merwe. president of the African Lion Working Group. in “Almost impossible to teach” ( 2002. p. 1008318u8613 ) . Furthermore. since returning them to the natural state is hard and dearly-won. many menageries can non even try it. “A 1994 study showed that merely 1. 200 out of 10. 000 zoos worldwide are registered for confined genteelness and wildlife preservation. Merely 2 per centum of the world’s threatened or endangered species are registered in confined genteelness programs” ( Kaufman. 1997. p. 611K7091 ) .
Alternatively of running menagerie. people should protect biodiversity. “Public money…should travel into habitat protection. into maintaining poachers and trophy huntsmans at bay. and into non-profit-making sanctuaries that are interested in assisting animate beings. non doing a net income from them” ( Kaufman. 1997. p. 611K7091 ) . As Morgan states. a 3rd of forest. without which most species can non be. “has been lost since agribusiness began 10. 000 old ages ago” ( 1995. pp. 136-143 ) . Therefore. let’s be more concerned about the safety of ecosystems instead than maintaining animate beings in menagerie by taking their freedom from them. Zoos should assist wildlife but non pull public or menagerie traders that may harm the “balance of the natural systems” ( Morgan. 1995. p. 136 ) .
Work Cited List:
About impossible to learn confined Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelams to run. says expert. ( 2002. November 14 )
Africa News Service. p. 1008318u8613.
Goldston. L. ( 1999. February 11 ) . Professional traders emerge as gatekeepers for 1000s of animate beings from menagerie. Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service.
Kaufman. R. ( 1997. June 11 ) . Zoos are ‘a lost universe. ’ Knight Ridder/Tribune News
Service. p. 611K7091.
Monkey concern. ( 1990. September 1 ) . The Economist ( US ) . 316. p. 65.
Morgan. S. ( 1995 ) . Ecology and the environment. New York: Oxford University Press.